A
publication of The Chelan/Douglas CASA Program, PO Box 2027,
Wenatchee, WA, 98807
(509)
662-7350, email:
cdcasa@nwi.net
Chelan
Douglas CASA volunteers provided over 15,055 hours last year to
protect children and promote their well-being!
The Chelan
Douglas CASA Program (Court Appointed Special Advocates for
Children) would like to announce two awards recently given to
community volunteers and supporters, who truly went above and
beyond in helping local children, suspected of being abused or
neglected, have a voice. Without their help, programs such as
CASA would not be able to function as volunteer child
advocates.
For Outstanding Volunteer Award – Carolyn Smith. Though Carolyn
has been the child advocate in several difficult cases, she has
remained calm, caring, thoughtful, and above all else, very
willing to make sure that the children were doing well. Carolyn
is a wonderful example of a dedicated CASA Guardian ad Litem.
Community Volunteer of the Year – Lisa Stroming, and the
Sunshine Girls Bible Club. About 4 years ago, Lisa started a
neighborhood Bible Club here in Wenatchee . As one of their
community service projects, CASA has been overwhelmed by their
thoughtful donations of toys for the CASA Christmas Stocking
Project (year after year), a quilt that the girls made to
raffle to raise money for more toys for foster children, and
bowling (and collecting pledges year after year) at the CASA /
YWCA Rock n Rowl Bowl-a-Thon for Kids!
A special thank you to both of these ladies, who do not help
others for the recognition, but to simply help. We, at the CASA
program, feel that these two ladies are an inspiration to us
all!
Meet Jeannette O’Donnell
Jeannette O’Donnell has been a CASA Guardian ad Litem for the last 6 ½ years, with 6 cases
that helped 10 kids. A legal secretary for 17 years,
Jeannette enjoys the opportunity to speak for her kids in
court and appreciates the deference given by the court to the
opinions of the CASAs.
When asked why she still
volunteers, Jeannette quickly responded that one of her CASA
kids was surprised when he found out that she was not being
paid to help him and was mystified that she had not given up
on him. Seeing his reaction made Jeannette feel a strong
commitment to seeing this young man through to the end of his
Dependency.
When asked what she feels is
the most difficult part of being a Guardian ad Litem,
Jeannette said that dealing with the “at times, inflexible”
Dependency system can be frustrating. In one circumstance,
liability issues have become a greater concern than what she
feels should be done for the child. The court cases can also
be emotionally challenging, as she seems to worry about the
CASA kids like she does her own children and grandchildren.
Jeannette has recommended
volunteering to some of her own co-workers and friends! As
Jeannette put it, “A CASA once told me that being a Guardian
ad Litem was the hardest things she did, but also the best
thing that she did, and I couldn’t
agree more! The whole point is to help for the greater
good through these wonderful kids”.
From the
Director
Did you
know that kids don’t have an automatic right to counsel or
any other type of representation in child abuse court actions?
According to the Seattle Times, “at least one-third of
Washington children who are removed from their homes don’t
have anyone at all to speak for them in court…” “We clearly
don’t, as a state, have an ethos that this is important,” said
Lisa Kelly, a U of W law professor.
A recent
study of all “50 states found that Washington is one of 16
states in which the law doesn’t require that kids in
dependency cases get their own lawyers.” However, federal law
states that each child in a dependency court must have
someone, either a Guardian ad Litem or Lawyer, represent
them. Here in our community, the courts use the CASA model of
trained volunteers to represent the best interests of children
as Guardians ad Litem. In many counties, children go
completely unrepresented.
Chelan
and Douglas Counties are blessed to have community citizens volunteering to ensure that
children have this important representation. “Studies have
indicated that cases take longer when the child goes
unrepresented, according to the state Office of Family and
Children’s Ombudsman. Lisa Kelly, who also runs the UW Law
School’s Children Ad Youth Advocacy Clinic, said she often
finds that children’s needs –such as visiting siblings – go
unmet if they’re not represented.”
Last
week, the Chelan Douglas CASA Program hosted a volunteer
recognition event to say Thank You for all that
CASA volunteers do for the children of our valley. Never
forget that each and every one of you are important in the
lives of our children!
By Susan
Baker, Chelan Douglas CASA Executive Director. (Quotes from
the Seattle Times)
From
Washington State CASA
There is $6 million
in additional funding for local CASA programs in the approved Washington
State budget! (This is new funding, in addition to our current
$1.8 mil allocation.) These additional resources will
go directly to local CASA programs via the courts to recruit,
train and support CASA volunteer representation for dependent
children.
This is a major
accomplishment for dependent children in our state. While this
does not get us all the way to a CASA for every dependent child
in Washington, with this funding, local CASA programs will be
able to stabilize their staff levels, lower caseloads and
serve more children with CASA volunteers.
We are very grateful to all of our CASA legislative partners,
our great local program staff, our board of directors and local
judges - all of your words of support to the legislature and
Governor's office made this happen for kids.
by Lara Rogers, Washington State CASA, (206.667.9716)
YMCA Summer Camp
Do you know a foster child that would like to go to summer camp?
Please let us know ASAP at the CASA office as we may be
able to help with some of the costs.
Introducing…
Social Worker, Michelle Erickson
began
working with the Division of Children and Family Services in
the Stevenson office before transferring to Wenatchee in
December, 2006. Michelle, an Eastmont High School graduate, has
her Master’s in Social Work from Eastern Washington University
(EWU) as well as her BA in Social Work, with a minor in
Spanish, from EWU.
Michelle
prides herself in having experience in many different settings
serving adolescents, such as:
¨
Working with
troubled and or adjudicated youth in a residential treatment
center and at-risk youth in Crisis Residential Centers
¨
Directing an
YMCA after school program
¨
Case
Managing Behavioral Rehabilitation Services for hard to place
foster children.
She enjoys
working with adolescents and is looking forward to what her
future with the Wenatchee DCFS office will bring.
Social Worker, Rebecca Springer
graduated from the University of Wisconsin-River Falls in 1991
with a Bachelor’s Degree in Sociology/Criminal Justice and
began working as a social worker for the Department of
Children’s Services in Wisconsin in 1993. Rebecca’s experience
includes:
¨
On-going and
investigative-CPS social work and licensing of foster homes
¨
Working with
youth at risk/juvenile probation and voluntary services
¨
Facilitating
parent trainings for foster parents and parents working with
DSHS
¨
Coordinating
Living Skills Program and serving on an inter-agency/county
tribal board
¨
Providing
services to adults with developmental disabilities.
Rebecca also
has 3 years experience working as a child and family counselor
for Teen Challenge and for Children’s Home Society, and
regularly volunteers for community outreach programs supporting
youth and families. During her career Rebecca has received
over 700 hours of post graduate training specific to Children
and Families and Mental Health Services. Above all things,
Rebecca sees herself as a mom first and devotes the majority of
her “off time” to her family and friends.
Social Worker, Rachel Jaffee
grew
up in Kirkland , WA, and received a Bachelor of Arts degree
from the University of Florida, and is bilingual in English and
Spanish. Rachel worked for the State of
Florida , Department of Children and Families, in mental
health, for two years after college and is currently pursuing a
Master’s degree in Social Work from
University
of Washington . Rachel’s experience includes:
¨
Mental
Health,
¨
Early
Childhood Education.
¨
Certified
Doula, Childbirth Educator and Maternity Case Manager
¨
Medical
Interpreter
¨
Family
Preservation Services.
Rachel moved
to Wenatchee with her son almost two years ago and loves waking
up to blue skies and not commuting for two hours each day!
Staying Drug Free
We all
hope that children will never use and abuse illegal drugs.
Here are recommendations from the US Department of Health and
Human Services for “Keeping Our Youth Drug Free”:
Keep communicating!
Be involved in their lives daily!
Make
clear rules and enforce them with appropriate consequences!
Be a positive role model yourself!
Teach children to choose friends wisely!
Monitor your child’s
activities!
Online
Training Education
The Arizona CASA program has
given permission to use their series of 18 training modules
that include topics such as: - Report Writing -
Testifying in Court - Interviewing Children - Munchausen’s
Syndrome by Proxy
Earn either 1/2 hour credit or
an hour credit for each module with the Chelan Douglas CASA
Program! Each module has a short exam. Please print out your
results for our office records.
Autism
Support Group
on the
3rd Monday of each month, 6:30 pm at King’s
Orchard Church, 1610
Orchard Street,Wenatchee.
All are welcome!
CASA Satellite Office
The Chelan Douglas CASA Satellite Office, at the Chelan County
Juvenile Center (316 Washington Street, Wenatchee) is now
open! If you need a quiet, confidential place to talk on the
phone, or meet with someone about your CASA case, this space is
available. Take elevator to the basement and follow the
signs.
Here is the scheduled times that the office will be open, or
please let us know at 509-662-7350 if you need to use the
office at another time.
Monday: 1-3
pm Tom Oelke
Tuesday: 1-3
pm Terry Finn
Wednesday: 8:00-8:45
am Sue Baker
12:15-1:00
pm
1-3
pm Sheila Berger
3:00-4:00
pm Sue Baker
Thursday:
9-11 am Debbie Tornabene, CASA attorney.
(Do you need legal advice
concerning your CASA case?)
Friday: 9-11:30
am Tracy Baker
From the Board
In our
beautiful Wenatchee Valley, the arrival of spring brings warmer
weather and apple blossoms. Spring also brings us the
opportunity to acknowledge and to give gratitude to our
wonderful volunteers. I had the privilege of attending a
lovely volunteer reception at the Woods House. Despite the
chilly wind outside, inside one could easily feel the warmth,
love and dedication of all the volunteers who could attend.
As I
listened to Sue speak so kindly of each of you, I was truly
amazed, and at times overwhelmed, as I realized the number of
years each volunteer had so generously given to children. As a
part of CASA and as a member of the local medical community, I
am well aware of the difficult and most often thankless jobs
each of you have chosen to take upon yourselves. Please know
that every minute, hour and day that you commit to the
children, is time spent giving and sharing unconditional love
for the children most unable to advocate for themselves. And,
whatever your belief system, we must all accept that sharing
love with others is what we were put on earth to do, first and
foremost. So, on behalf of the CASA Board of Directors, we all
say “Thank You”, and raise a toast, give a round of applause
and bow down in your honor.
We are also
very excited about the funds we received because of the hard
work of the Junior Guild and their Follies Production. We are
currently looking for new larger locations for the CASA office
that will have space for our CASA Closet. I will share more
news as final plans and decisions are made, but it is a very
exhilarating process.
Peace Be
With Every one of you.
Brenda
Baumeister, President, Board of Directors
From the Bench
The
Developmentally Disabled Parent
by Bart
Vandegrift
In
dependency and termination proceedings, a developmentally
disabled (“DD”) parent faces special challenges to comply with
Court-ordered services. The parent’s attorney, the CASA,
the Department, service providers and the Court need to be
aware of the parent’s limitations when communicating with the
parent and when formulating a reunification plan.
Nevertheless, with few exceptions, the law does not provide
special protections for the DD parent.
“`Developmental disability’ means a disability attributable to
mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, or
another neurological or other condition of an individual found
by the secretary to be closely related to mental retardation or
to require treatment similar to that required for individuals
with mental retardation, which disability originates before the
individual attains age eighteen, which has continued or can be
expected to continue indefinitely, and which constitutes a
substantial handicap to the individual.” RCW 13.34.030(6).
One of
the few special legal protections mentioned above is the
prohibition that “no parent or guardian may be deemed abusive
or neglectful solely by reason of the parent’s or child’s
blindness, deafness, developmental disability, or other
handicap.” RCW 26.44.015(3). This means that a child may
not be taken from the DD parent just because the parent is
developmentally disabled. There still must be proof that
the parent is incapable of adequately caring for the child or
that the parent is abusing or neglecting the child. “A child
should not be left in the custody of a parent whose [mental
condition] renders the parent unable to understand or meet the
needs of the child.” Welfare of H.S., 94 Wash.
App. 511, 528 (1999).
Another
special legal protection is that the Department’s “reasonable
efforts” to reunify the family must be weighed in light of the
parent’s limitations. “Reasonable efforts” requires the
Department to provide services that are modified to accommodate
a parent’s specific disabilities. Welfare of A.J.R., 78
Wash. App. 222, 229 (1995).
A third
special legal protection is that the Department must comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”). The ADA requires the
Department to make reasonable accommodations to allow a
disabled parent to receive the Court ordered services. 42
U.S.C. § 12132; 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7) (1994); Welfare
of A.J.R., 78 Wash. App. 222, 229-230 (1995).
Nevertheless, “the [ADA] does not require public entities to
provide the disabled with services not offered to others.”
Welfare of H.S., 94 Wash. App. 511, 521 (1999); id.,
Welfare of Angelo H., 124 Wash. App. 578, 587 (2004).
Welfare of A.J.R., 78 Wash. App. 222 (1995), both the “reasonable efforts” requirement
and the provisions of the ADA were satisfied where the
developmentally disabled parents were given psychological
evaluations, pictorial instructions and daily lessons by a
public health nurse, visual teaching aids in their parenting
classes, and referral to services from the Division of
Developmental Disabilities (“DDD”)
(which provided an alternative living provider). This Court
considers it a “best practice” to refer DD parents to DDD for
services in dependency actions. Note, however, that a referral
of DD parents to DDD for services is not a prerequisite to
termination of their parental rights. Welfare of Angelo H.,
124 Wash. App. 578, 587 (2004).
In
termination actions, one of the elements the Department must
allege and prove is that “there is little likelihood that
conditions will be remedied so that the child can be returned
to the parent in the near future. A parent’s failure to
substantially improve parental deficiencies within twelve
months following entry of the dispositional order shall give
rise to a rebuttable presumption that there is little
likelihood that conditions will be remedied so that the child
can be returned to the parent in the near future. The
presumption shall not arise unless the petitioner makes a
showing that all necessary services reasonably capable of
correcting the parental deficiencies within the foreseeable
future have been clearly offered or provided. In determining
whether the conditions will be remedied the court may consider,
but is not limited to, the following facts: Psychological
incapacity or mental deficiency of the parent that is so severe
and chronic as to render the parent incapable of providing
proper care for the child for extended periods of time or for
periods of time that present a risk of imminent harm to the
child, and documented unwillingness of the parent to receive
and complete treatment or documentation that there is no
treatment that can render the parent capable of providing
proper care for the child in the near future.” RCW
13.34.180(1)(e). Even with this presumption, the Department is
required to prove that it is highly probable that the parent’s
condition will not improve in the near future. Welfare of
C.B., 134 Wash. App. 942 (2006).
One
final issue that should be addressed whenever a parent has
cognitive limitations is whether he or she is competent to
understand the legal proceedings and effectively assist his or
her attorney. If any party, including the
CASA, suspects that the
parent is or may not be competent, the matter should be brought
to the Court’s attention so that the Court may decide whether
to hold a hearing to determine if a Guardian ad Litem
should be appointed to represent the best interests of the
parent.
(Bart Vandegrift has been the Chelan County Superior Court Commissioner
since 1995. He is the judicial officer primarily assigned to
judge dependency actions in
Chelan
County.)
Individualized Education Program: IEP
Each public school child who receives special education and
related services must have an Individualized Education Program
(IEP).
The IEP is designed for that one student as a truly
individualized document by creating an opportunity for
teachers, parents, school administrators, related services
personnel, and students (when appropriate) to work together to
improve educational results for children with disabilities. To
create an effective IEP, parents, teachers, other school
staff--and often the student--must come together to look
closely at the student's unique needs. These individuals pool
knowledge, experience and commitment to design an educational
program that will help the student be involved in, and progress
in, the general curriculum. The IEP guides the delivery of
special education supports and services for the student with a
disability. Without a doubt, writing--and implementing--an
effective IEP requires teamwork.
The IEP team
must review the child's IEP at least once a year to see whether
the child is achieving his or her annual goals and to revise
the child's IEP, if necessary, to address:
√
the child's progress toward annual goals in the general
curriculum;
√
information gathered through any reevaluation of the child;
√
information about the child that the parents share;
√
information about the child that the school shares (for
example, insights from the teacher based on his or her
observation of the child or the child's class work);
√
the child's anticipated needs
The team may
review and revise the IEP more often than once a year, if
needed. Either the parents or the school can ask to hold an IEP
meeting to revise the child's IEP. For example, the child may
not be making progress toward his or her IEP goals, and his or
her teacher or parents may become concerned. On the other hand,
the child may have met most or all of the goals in the IEP, and
new ones need to be written. In either case, the IEP team would
meet to revise the IEP.
from the
US Department of Education web site at:
www.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide
Updated:
05/14/2007